- #1

- 29

- 0

## Homework Statement

Show that the Hamiltonian [itex]H = (p^2/2m)+V[/itex] commutes with all three components of

**L**, provided that

*V*depends only on

*r*.

## Homework Equations

In previous parts of the problem, I've worked out the following relations:

[tex][L_z,x] = i\hbar y, \quad [L_z,y] = -i\hbar x, \quad [L_z, z] = 0,\\

[L_z, p_x] = i\hbar p_y, \quad [L_z, p_y] = -i\hbar p_x, \quad [L_z, p_z] = 0,\\

[L_z, L_x] = i \hbar L_y, \quad [L_z, r^2] = xy(xp_x - yp_y), \quad [L_z, p^2] = (xp_x -yp_y)p_xp_y [/tex]

where

[tex] p_i = \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial i}, \quad r^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2,\\

p^2 = p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2, \quad L_z = yp_z - zp_y [/tex]

## The Attempt at a Solution

I started with [itex][L_z, H][/itex], expanded it, cancelled a bunch of stuff and wound up with,

[tex] [L_z, H] = \frac{1}{2m}(xp_yp_x^2 - yp_xp_y^2) + xp_yV - yp_xV + Vxp_y - Vyp_X. [/tex]

Assuming I did everything right, I need this equation to equal 0 to show [itex]L_z[/itex] commutes with [itex]H[/itex] and the problem suggests that this can only be the case if [itex]V[/itex] is a function of [itex]r[/itex], but I don't see how to get there. Any help would be appreciated.

Last edited: