Chapter III. 3544 —Marcion Insinuated the Untrustworthiness of Certain Apostles Whom St. Paul Rebuked. The Rebuke Shows that It Cannot Be Regarded as Derogating from Their Authority. The Apostolic Gospels Perfectly Authentic.
In the scheme of Marcion, on the contrary, 3545 the mystery 3546 of the Christian religion begins from the discipleship of Luke. Since, however, it was on its course previous to that point, it must have had 3547 its own authentic materials, 3548 by means of which it found its own way down to St. Luke; and by the assistance of the testimony which it bore, Luke himself becomes admissible. Well, but 3549 Marcion, finding the Epistle of Paul to the Galatians (wherein he rebukes even apostles 3550 ) for “not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel,” 3551 as well as accuses certain false apostles of perverting the gospel of Christ), labours very hard to destroy the character 3552 of those Gospels which are published as genuine 3553 and under the name of apostles, in order, forsooth, to secure for his own Gospel the credit which he takes away from them. But then, even if he censures Peter and John and James, who were thought to be pillars, it is for a manifest reason. They seemed to be changing their company 3554 from respect of persons. And yet as Paul himself “became all things to all men,” 3555 that he might gain all, it was possible that Peter also might have betaken himself to the same plan of practising somewhat different from what he taught. And, in like manner, if false apostles also crept in, their character too showed itself in their insisting upon circumcision and the Jewish ceremonies. So that it was not on account of their preaching, but of their conversation, that they were marked by St. Paul, who would with equal impartiality have marked them with censure, if they had erred at all with respect to God the Creator or His Christ. Each several case will therefore have to be distinguished. When Marcion complains that apostles are suspected (for their prevarication and dissimulation) of having even depraved the gospel, he thereby accuses Christ, by accusing those whom Christ chose. If, then, the apostles, who are censured simply for inconsistency of walk, composed the Gospel in a pure form, 3556 but false apostles interpolated their true record; and if our own copies have been made from these, 3557 where will that genuine text 3558 of the apostles writings be found which has not suffered adulteration? Which was it that enlightened Paul, and through him Luke? It is either completely blotted out, as if by some deluge—being obliterated by the inundation of falsifiers—in which case even Marcion does not possess the true Gospel; or else, is that very edition which Marcion alone possesses the true one, that is, of the apostles? How, then, does that agree with ours, which is said not to be (the work) of apostles, but of Luke? Or else, again, if that which Marcion uses is not to be attributed to Luke simply because it does agree with ours (which, of course, 3559 is, also adulterated in its title), then it is the work of apostles. Our Gospel, therefore, which is in agreement with it, is equally the work of apostles, but also adulterated in its title. 3560
This is Oehlers arrangement of the chapter, for the sake of the sense. The former editions begin this third chapter with “Sed enim Marcion nactus.”348:3545
Aliud est si.348:3546
See Gal. 2:13, 14.348:3551
Compare what has been already said in book i. chap. 20, and below in book v. chap. 3. See also Tertullians treatise, De Præscript. Hæret. chap. 23. [Kaye, p. 275.]348:3552
1 Cor. ix. 22.348:3556
Inde nostra digesta.348:3558
That is, according to the Marcionite cavil.348:3560
De titulo quoque.